However, after the seventh amendment to the constitution, this situation has changed. In the seventh amendment to the constitution, in addition to reducing the number of legislators to the current 113 seats, switching to a two-vote system for a single constituency, and extending the term of office to four years, the powers of the national assembly were also removed, and the the power of referendum on the constitution, which was previously exercised by the national assembly, is transferred to the referendum of all the people.
According to article 12 of the current ghost mannequin effect service amendments to the constitution, amendments to the constitution must go through the following two procedures: 1/4 of the legislative members of the legislative yuan proposed amendments to the constitution, 3/4 of them attended, and 3/4 of the resolutions of the members present. Half a year after the announcement, the electors voted for a review, and the valid consent votes exceeded 1/2 of the total number of electors. Is there anything wrong with such a constitutional amendment threshold? However, after the amendment of such a constitutional amendment threshold, some people think it is inappropriate.
In terms of the threshold of the proposal, 3/4 of all legislative members are present, and the consent of 3/4 of the present members is already a very high threshold requirement. What's more, it must have the consent of "More than half of all suffrage people"? Such a threshold for constitutional amendment may make it difficult for the constitution to adapt to social changes, and must rely on judicial interpretation to expand the scope of protection of the constitution. Therefore, some people think that it will be extremely difficult to see the eighth constitutional amendment in the future.